The tools that quietly run in the background of most small businesses, checked one by one.
Chances are your business already has AI in it that nobody thinks of as AI. Grammarly checking your emails. Otter.ai transcribing a client call. HubSpot suggesting the best time to send a newsletter, or drafting a follow-up email for you. None of these were bought as compliance risks, and for the most part, they aren't.
Grammarly and similar writing assistants sit at minimal risk. They're suggesting changes to text a person reviews and sends. Otter.ai and meeting transcription tools are minimal risk for the transcription itself, though it's good practice, and courteous, to tell call participants a recording is being made and processed by AI.
HubSpot is the one worth a second look, because it bundles several AI features under one name. Content suggestions and send-time optimisation sit at minimal risk. Lead scoring and behavioural prediction are usually still minimal risk when they're ranking prospects for your sales team to work through, not making a decision by themselves. It shifts if that score starts deciding who gets access to something, a credit term, a discount, a service tier, without a person checking it. The next post on lead scoring goes into that distinction.
Almost every small business already has half a dozen AI tools running quietly in the background, and almost none of them need a compliance project. The ones that do share one thing in common: they're making a decision about a real person, not just supporting one your team makes. That's the line worth checking against.
Not sure where your business stands?
Answer a few questions about the AI tools you use and find out in about two minutes. Free, no sign up needed.
Check your risk level